About this page

Various Licenses and Comments about Them - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation

https://gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html

“We classify a license according to certain key criteria: Whether it qualifies as a free software license. Whether it is a copyleft license. Whether it is compatible with the GNU GPL. Unless otherwise specified, compatible licenses are compatible with both GPLv2 and GPLv3. Whether it causes any...” (from the page’s text)

Topic: Technology › Software Development
Quality: Quality 87 scored 12 Aug 2025
Language: english
Text on page: 80,788 characters
Page size: 140 kB
Answered: OK (200), HTML
Last read: 7 Jul 2025
In our index since: 7 Jul 2025
Safe search: Not checked yet
Links to it: Linked from 6 sites

More from gnu.org

This site's best pages we know: ranked by how many other sites link to them.

The GNU Operating System and the Free Software Movement linked from 6 sites About ›
The GNU General Public License v3.0 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation linked from 6 sites About ›
GNU General Public License v2.0 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation linked from 5 sites About ›
Licenses - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation linked from 5 sites About ›
GNU General Public License v2.0 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation linked from 5 sites About ›
GNU Emacs - GNU Project linked from 5 sites About ›
The GNU General Public License v3.0 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation linked from 4 sites About ›
Why Free Software Needs Free Documentation - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation linked from 2 sites About ›

All pages from this site ›

Tools for this page

Other sites that can tell you more. Plain links: we don't track where you go.

Archive

Cached copy Internet Archive: every snapshot
archive.today second archive

About the site

Domain owner ICANN registration lookup
Certificates certificate transparency, subdomains
Safety check Safe Browsing status
Trackers The Markup's Blacklight
Is it down? for everyone, or just you

Discussions

Hacker News stories linking here
Reddit posts from this site
Wikipedia articles mentioning the site

For web makers

PageSpeed Lighthouse report
HTML validator W3C
Accessibility WAVE by WebAIM
Security headers

Who links to it

fsf.org “various licenses and comments about them”
wikipedia.org “a free license as approved by the free software foundation (fsf)”
coreinfrastructure.org “why this license”
bestpractices.dev “el original”
nongnu.org “free”
sourceforge.io “gnu general public license v2”
wikisource.org “gnu gpl”
wordpress.org “gpl-incompatible, free software licenses”

Sites: fsf.org, wikipedia.org, coreinfrastructure.org, bestpractices.dev, nongnu.org, sourceforge.io, wikisource.org, wordpress.org

“Not rated yet” and similar notes are shown on purpose: we say what we haven't measured, so the page doesn't look emptier or better than it is.