About this page

Section 230 Success Case: Wikipedia | Electronic Frontier Foundation

https://eff.org/issues/cda230/successes/wikipedia

“Wikipedia is a perfect example of a site that relies on the immunities afforded by Section 230. The website—the seventh most popular site in the world—is a completely user-generated online encyclopedia that is freely available in hundreds of different languages.We spoke with Michelle Paulson, legal...” (the page’s own description)

Topic: Not categorised yet
Quality: Not rated yet
Language: English
Text on page: 12,115 characters
Page size: 44 kB
Answered: OK (200), HTML
Last read: 7 Jul 2025
In our index since: 7 Jul 2025
Safe search: Not checked yet
Links to it: Linked from 1 site

More from eff.org

This site's best pages we know: ranked by how many other sites link to them.

Electronic Frontier Foundation | Defending your rights in the digital world linked from 11 sites About ›
HTTPS Everywhere | Electronic Frontier Foundation linked from 2 sites About ›
Hachette v. Internet Archive | Electronic Frontier Foundation linked from 2 sites About ›
Why Join the Fight? | Electronic Frontier Foundation linked from 1 site About ›
EFFector | Electronic Frontier Foundation About ›
Legal Cases | Electronic Frontier Foundation About ›
Cover Your Tracks | Electronic Frontier Foundation About ›
Privacy Badger | Electronic Frontier Foundation About ›

All pages from this site ›

Tools for this page

Other sites that can tell you more. Plain links: we don't track where you go.

Archive

Cached copy Internet Archive: every snapshot
archive.today second archive

About the site

Domain owner ICANN registration lookup
Certificates certificate transparency, subdomains
Safety check Safe Browsing status
Trackers The Markup's Blacklight
Is it down? for everyone, or just you

Discussions

Hacker News stories linking here
Reddit posts from this site
Wikipedia articles mentioning the site

For web makers

PageSpeed Lighthouse report
HTML validator W3C
Accessibility WAVE by WebAIM
Security headers

Who links to it

https://eff.org/issues/cda230/successes/wikipedia “Wikipedia”

“Not rated yet” and similar notes are shown on purpose: we say what we haven't measured, so the page doesn't look emptier or better than it is.