About this page

JOT — Contents

https://doi.org/10.5381/jot.2016.15.5.a1

“Journal of Object Technology” (the page’s own description)

Topic: Technology › Software Development
Quality: Quality 84 scored 12 Aug 2025
Language: english
Text on page: 2,136 characters
Page size: 7 kB
Answered: OK (200), HTML
Last read: 8 Jul 2025
In our index since: 8 Jul 2025
Safe search: Not checked yet
Links to it: Linked from 1 site

More from doi.org

This site's best pages we know: ranked by how many other sites link to them.

Open Social Scholarship Annotated Bibliography | KULA: Knowledge Creation,... linked from 3 sites About ›
2028-02-14 - HAL - CoreTrustSeal Requirements 2023-2025 - CoreTrustSeal linked from 3 sites About ›
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing - ACL Anthology linked from 3 sites About ›
Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional... linked from 2 sites About ›
Pop! Foundations for the Canadian Humanities and Social Sciences Commons linked from 2 sites About ›
Understanding Community Resilience: Quantifying the Effects of Sudden Popularity via... linked from 2 sites About ›
Leveraging Opposite Gender Interaction Ratio as a Path towards Fairness in Online... linked from 2 sites About ›
Measuring the Monetary Value of Online Volunteer Work | Proceedings of the... linked from 2 sites About ›

All pages from this site ›

Tools for this page

Other sites that can tell you more. Plain links: we don't track where you go.

Archive

Cached copy Internet Archive: every snapshot
archive.today second archive

About the site

Domain owner ICANN registration lookup
Certificates certificate transparency, subdomains
Safety check Safe Browsing status
Trackers The Markup's Blacklight
Is it down? for everyone, or just you

Discussions

Hacker News stories linking here
Reddit posts from this site
Wikipedia articles mentioning the site

For web makers

PageSpeed Lighthouse report
HTML validator W3C
Accessibility WAVE by WebAIM
Security headers

Who links to it

grouplens.org

“Not rated yet” and similar notes are shown on purpose: we say what we haven't measured, so the page doesn't look emptier or better than it is.