About this page

Two polls on how to revise PEP 649 - PEPs - Discussions on Python.org

https://discuss.python.org/t/two-polls-on-how-to-revise-pep-649/23628

“Howdy howdy. Let’s talk about PEP 649, Deferred Evaluation Of Annotations Using Descriptors. I think the PEP has an excellent chance of being accepted. However, the PEP needs to be revised, and there are two particula…” (the page’s own description)

Topic: Not categorised yet
Quality: Not rated yet
Language: English
Text on page: 24,990 characters
Page size: 79 kB
Answered: OK (200), HTML
Last read: 7 Jul 2025
In our index since: 7 Jul 2025
Safe search: Not checked yet
Links to it: 4 links from 2 sites

More from discuss.python.org

This site's best pages we know: ranked by how many other sites link to them.

Discussions on Python.org linked from 8 sites About ›
PyPI security work: multifactor auth progress & help needed - Packaging - Discussions... linked from 2 sites About ›
An update on pip and dependency resolution - Packaging - Discussions on Python.org linked from 2 sites About ›
Profile - steve.dower - Discussions on Python.org linked from 1 site About ›
Profile - pablogsal - Discussions on Python.org linked from 1 site About ›
Profile - thomas - Discussions on Python.org linked from 1 site About ›
Profile - nad - Discussions on Python.org linked from 1 site About ›
Profile - EWDurbin - Discussions on Python.org linked from 1 site About ›

All pages from this site ›

Tools for this page

Other sites that can tell you more. Plain links: we don't track where you go.

Archive

Cached copy Internet Archive: every snapshot
archive.today second archive

About the site

Domain owner ICANN registration lookup
Certificates certificate transparency, subdomains
Safety check Safe Browsing status
Trackers The Markup's Blacklight
Is it down? for everyone, or just you

Discussions

Hacker News stories linking here
Reddit posts from this site
Wikipedia articles mentioning the site

For web makers

PageSpeed Lighthouse report
HTML validator W3C
Accessibility WAVE by WebAIM
Security headers

Who links to it

https://discuss.python.org/t/two-polls-on-how-to-revise-pep-649/23628 “Two polls on how to revise PEP 649”
https://discuss.python.org/t/a-massive-pep-649-update-with-some-major-course-corrections/25672 “the last discussion topic from a few weeks back.”
https://peps.python.org/pep-0649 “07-Feb-2023”
https://peps.python.org/pep-0649/ “07-Feb-2023”

Sites: discuss.python.org, peps.python.org

“Not rated yet” and similar notes are shown on purpose: we say what we haven't measured, so the page doesn't look emptier or better than it is.