About this page

Circle Jerks & Web Elitists – A List Apart

https://alistapart.com/article/circlejerk

“The web design community goes through this kind of self-examination every three months. Under the banner of honest criticism, names are named, guesses about motivation are sketched, and sometimes entire bodies of work are dismissed.” (the page’s own description)

Topic: Community Forums › Technical Forums
Quality: Quality 84 scored 12 Aug 2025
Language: english
Text on page: 16,693 characters
Page size: 86 kB
Answered: OK (200), HTML
Last read: 7 Jul 2025
In our index since: 7 Jul 2025
Safe search: Not checked yet
Links to it: No other site we've read links here yet

More from alistapart.com

This site's best pages we know: ranked by how many other sites link to them.

A List Apart – For people who make websites linked from 9 sites About ›
Quantity Queries for CSS – A List Apart linked from 4 sites About ›
Responsive Web Design – A List Apart linked from 3 sites About ›
Write for Us – A List Apart linked from 2 sites About ›
The Wax and the Wane of the Web – A List Apart linked from 2 sites About ›
Nothing Fails Like Success – A List Apart linked from 2 sites About ›
Fear of Style Sheets – A List Apart linked from 2 sites About ›
Faux Columns – A List Apart linked from 2 sites About ›

All pages from this site ›

Tools for this page

Other sites that can tell you more. Plain links: we don't track where you go.

Archive

Cached copy Internet Archive: every snapshot
archive.today second archive

About the site

Domain owner ICANN registration lookup
Certificates certificate transparency, subdomains
Safety check Safe Browsing status
Trackers The Markup's Blacklight
Is it down? for everyone, or just you

Discussions

Hacker News stories linking here
Reddit posts from this site
Wikipedia articles mentioning the site

For web makers

PageSpeed Lighthouse report
HTML validator W3C
Accessibility WAVE by WebAIM
Security headers

Who links to it

We haven't seen any links to this page yet. That usually means we haven't crawled the pages that link to it, not that there are none.

“Not rated yet” and similar notes are shown on purpose: we say what we haven't measured, so the page doesn't look emptier or better than it is.