“Authors scored according to field of work, publications within the topic and citing works within the topic. Missing authors here? Then go to the curation page to resolve the author names. Co-author graph The 25 most prolific authors and some of their key co-authors. Awards received by authors who...”
(from the page’s text)
- Topic
-
Not categorised yet
- Quality
-
Not rated yet
- Language
-
Not detected yet
- Text on page
-
1,282 characters
- Page size
-
71 kB
- Answered
-
OK (200), HTML
- Last read
-
6 Jul 2025
- In our index since
-
6 Jul 2025
- Safe search
-
Not checked yet
- Links to it
-
9 links from 2 sites
Who links to it
-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:internet_search_engines
“Scholia”
-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Internet_search_engines?uselang=ja
“Scholia”
-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Internet_search_engines?uselang=ms
“Scholia”
-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Internet_search_engines?uselang=bs
“Scholia”
-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Internet_search_engines?uselang=ko
“Scholia”
-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Internet_search_engines?uselang=fr
“Scholia”
-
https://iw.toolforge.org/scholia/Q4182287
“Work”
-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Internet_search_engines?uselang=vi
“Scholia”
-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Internet_search_engines
“Scholia”
Sites: commons.wikimedia.org, iw.toolforge.org
“Not rated yet” and similar notes are shown on purpose: we say what we haven't measured, so the page doesn't look emptier or better than it is.